Q&A: Is AVATAR’s success considered controversial considering that 95% was digitally made?
by Ken Lund
Question by SUB-ZERO: FLAWLESS VICTORY: Is AVATAR’s success considered controversial considering that 95% was digitally made?
Is AVATAR’s money making success considered controversial considering that 95% was digitally made?
A long list of professions that are used to make movies were not used for this movie.
Make-up artists, plastic modelers, tailors, hairdressers, robot mechanics, stand in for actors…
that’s just a few professions in film making…there are many, many more professions that employs thousand and thousands of people for just one movie. And, even the professions that were still used for this movie only employed 25% from what a normal movie uses like the Camera People and Crane operators.
Is now the king of the “Box Office” and Hollywood is not going to ignore how a movie that only cost half of what a normal movie cost to make can make so much money and not care that millions and millions of people will be left unemployed.
————————
@ Kayla– I’m not saying I personally have anything against it.
Many Hollywood stars are known for being picky and spoiled and soon directors will kick them out over a CGI actor.
—————————-
@ Pete S–> This will be the only movie of it’s kind that cost that much to make because it is the movie that invented the technology (inhenced it)…all that money was used to build the technology that then will be used by the tsunamy of films afterwards.
Best answer:
Answer by Kayla
No its wonderful………………Low budget to make and making tons of money………….I don’t care how it was made as long as its good right………….If anyone thinks they should not spend their money because it took jobs from other people…..Don’t watch it…..And don’t you wish you would have thought of it first!
Give your answer to this question below!